|
Submission
from ALGAO:Scotland
Joanna Duncan
Scottish Natural Heritage
Battleby
Redgorton
Perth, PH1 3EW
28th November
2008
Dear Ms Duncan,
Renewable
Energy - Wind Energy: Designing wind-farms in the landscape
ALGAO:Scotland
represents Local Authority and National Park archaeological services
in Scotland and is part of the UK-wide organisation, ALGAO:UK. We
welcome this opportunity to comment upon this Scottish Natural Heritage
consultation and would like to offer the following comments and
recommendations.
ALGAO:Scotland
in principle welcomes SNH's production of this set of guidelines
for the designing of wind-farms within Scotland's landscape. Today's
Scottish landscape is essentially man-made, having been shaped and
managed by human activity since earliest pre-history, with even
our most natural of landscapes being the result of human interaction
with the natural environment (e.g. designed landscapes, plantations,
Neolithic and Bronze Age forest clearances). Accordingly it is disappointing
that this draft document does not have clearer references, both
as a core principle and embedded within the text, to consideration
and understanding of archaeology and the historic environment.
Taking the
above into consideration, I would like to make the following detailed
comments:
Section
2 - Consents Framework, Landscape & visual impacts
P4 para. 3-5, The discussion of key characteristics of a landscape
should include reference to the fact that key landscape characteristics
may be the result of particular types of human land-use, and can
include characteristic types of monument, for example shielings
and stone dykes, which set scale and character for large areas of
land.
P5. para. 4
The discussion of small windfarms should include mention of the
cumulative impacts of even very small 1-3 turbine developments
Para. 6, We
support and would like to emphasis the point that as most of these
sites are unlikely to be decommissioned until after 25 years, and
that their impacts cannot be merely calculated as being temporary
in nature.
Section
3 - wind turbines
P6, para. 6, should mention that underground power lines could have
significant archaeological implications.
P7, paras.
3-8, discussion of turbine size should include not only of the scale
of contemporary human landscapes, but the scale of monuments and
archaeological and historical landscapes
Section
4 - siting and layout
P9, para. 5-7
The discussion of landscape character should include the fact that
such character is derived from its history, as well as geology,
modern settlement and land use. Arising from this, in para. 7, the
comment that large scale, extensive, open, exposed landscapes, lacking
in focal elements are better able to accommodate large wind farms
is, we feel, a potentially dangerous over-simplification. Such landscapes
may contain important focal elements which are small in size but
extensive in scale - e.g. cairns, way markers, paths, drove roads,
outfield dykes. The scale of large wind farms could overwhelm such
important archaeological sites, and radically change landscape character.
P 10, para.
1, landscape value - the list of reasons for landscape value should
include historical as well as cultural associations.
P11. para.
2, existing focal points, pattern, and settlement should all include
strengthened mention of the historical environment.
P12, para 3,
land use - should include mention of the fact that historic land
use has shaped the modern form and character of the landscape, and
should therefore be respected
Section
5 - designing for multiple windfarms
P14, para 6, worth including mention that other cultural as well
as natural heritage issues will also have to be considered to develop
a robust framework.
We hope that
our comments and recommendations are incorporated within the final
document. ALGAO:Scotland would welcome the opportunity to engage
in further discussions on this important subject.
Yours faithfully,
John A Lawson Chair ALGAO:Scotland
Consultations
index
ALGAO:Scotland
|