|
Submission
from ALGAO:England
Consultation
paper on a new Planning Policy Statement 4: Planning for Prosperous
Economies
The Association
of Local Government Archaeological Officers for England (ALGAO:England)
is the national body representing local government archaeology services
at County, District, Metropolitan, Unitary and National Park level
in England. ALGAO:England co-ordinates the views of its member authorities
(93 in total) and presents them to government and to other national
organisations. It also acts as an advisor to the Local Government
Association (LGA) on archaeological matters. The range of interests
of our members embraces all aspects of the historic environment
including archaeology, buildings and the historic landscape.
We recognise
the Government's aims to deliver economically sustainable development,
both in town and country, and welcome this opportunity to demonstrate
the contribution that the historic environment can make to these
objectives. Indeed, we are greatly encouraged to see that, in the
context of planning town centres, the Government wants `the historic,
archaeological, architectural heritage of centres to be conserved
and, where appropriate, enhanced to provide a sense of place and
a focus for the community and for civic activity'. Our members look
forward to supporting local authorities, and planning applicants,
to inform their understanding of, and thus decision-making on, the
contribution that the historic environment can make to sustainable
development in, or on the edge of, historic town centres.
Equally, rural
settlement has a deep historic character, and we welcome the stress
on re-using rural buildings (policy EC4.1.8), and especially historic
buildings, to preserve that character and contribute to making the
sustainable communities of the future. In the rural context too,
archaeological heritage may also need to be taken into account in
planning decision-making.
In answer to
your question 1. Do you support the consolidation and streamlining
of national planning policy on economic development into a single
policy statement? What do you think are the costs and benefits
of the approach? We do support the consolidation of these policies,
but feel that greater recognition of, or cross-reference to, other
pertinent Planning Policy Statements would set decision-making on
economic imperatives into the context of broader considerations,
that ultimately affect the economic planning considerations of applicants.
These should of course be captured in Local Development Frameworks
in addition to the policies advocated in this PPS, and enable fully-rounded
site selection and assessment of viability.
Convenor, ALGAO
Planning & Legislation Committee
Consultations
index
Planning
and Legislation Committee
|